Texas Tower TT-4 (1/2)

Texas Tower #4
Type:
collapsed radar platform, USAF
Built:
1955, Portland ME USA
Specs:
( 67 ft above water) 6000 tons, 14 crew (minimum)
Sunk:
Sunday January 15, 1961
storm/structural failure/design deficiency - no survivors
GPS:
39°47'56.43" -72°40'08.00" (US Navy 2004)
Depth:
180 ft, starts at 110 ft

The Texas Tower was named for its resemblance to an oil rig. It was one of three Air Force radar platforms placed off the eastern seaboard as part of the DEW ( Distant Early Warning ) Line. ( Towers #1 and #5 were never built. )

Unfortunately, this one was placed in deep water on an unstable mud bottom, whereas the other two were placed in shallow water on a solid, rocky bottom. From the beginning, there were structural and stability problems with Tower #4. It was decided to abandon it, but not before the sensitive radar equipment could be removed, to prevent it from falling into the hands of hovering Russian "trawlers."

As a precaution, the crew was reduced to a bare minimum. Just before the end, the platform's commander requested desperately that the tower be abandoned, but was ordered to stay on. The entire crew was lost when the tower collapsed in a hurricane. Only two bodies were even recovered.

For a long time, the Texas Tower remained largely intact, propped up at an angle by its remaining leg. However, the latest reports are that over the winter of '99-'00, the tower collapsed even further, the remaining leg having pushed through the deck, leaving the highest point now at 120 ft instead of 65, and sinking lower. Anything interesting is below 140 ft - that's a mighty long boat ride to see a deep junk pile.

Texas Tower #4
The way it used to look.

Strange that with all the government's resources, they couldn't construct a solid tower in 180 feet of water, when just a few years later the oil companies were building similar structures in hundreds or even thousands of feet of water. In the decades to follow, offshore drilling platforms that would dwarf the Texas Tower became commonplace.

 1 2  

Comments on Texas Tower

Questions or Inquiries?

Just want to say Hello? Sign the .

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Click image to replace if unable to read.

Enter the digits from the image above, except for the last one:

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


by Paul Humann

I am confounded by the illogic of many of those who try to defend the buddy system, even the spokesperson for a training agency such as PADI - the same folks who preached the dangers of dive computers and Nitrox a few years back. Here is some of the nonsense I've heard and why it is just that:

The buddy system makes diving more fun and practical

Of course, neither has anything to do with the buddy system. Fun is touted as sharing the dive and the after-dive experience with your buddy. Practicality means helping your buddy lug around equipment, get suited up, and other niceties. These benefits can be enjoyed with any dive companion without that person being a "buddy" for whose safety you are legally responsible.

Printed from njscuba.net