Bald Eagle

Shipwreck Bald Eagle rocks
Type:
shipwreck, barge (s?)
Depth:
90 ft

The "Bald Eagle" consists of a substantial amount of wreckage, including stone piles, wood ribs, metal ribs, and metal debris. The wreckage is scattered in all directions, and this, along with the variety of different materials found, makes it very likely that this is not a single wreck, but the superimposed remains of two or more unidentified vessels. In one part there is a recognizable stern section, with a propeller. Some parts of the wreck are separated from the main section, and may in fact be small wrecks of their own. Or it could all be the torn-apart remains of a single very large wreck.

Judging by the bottles you can find, at least part of this wreck dates from the early part of the twentieth century. However, these could have been dumped onto the site after the fact. Lobstering here is often an exercise in frustration, but it would be unusual to go home without at least one. Sometimes you can move the stones to get at them, but most of them have seemingly bottomless holes to retreat into. Fish life is profuse. Visibility tends to be better than inshore sites, but still not great, and easily ruined by stirring up the silty bottom.

Shipwreck Bald Eagle sponge
Cunner inspects a sponge on the Bald Eagle
starfish
As you can see, there is a good deal of color on this wreck, which is really not fully expressed in these pictures.

The Bald Eagle sits on the edge of the old 12-Mile dump. It is possible that when the vessel was worn-out, it was simply sunk, full of garbage, now diver treasure. Or the garbage was dumped on top of the wreck.


Comments on Bald Eagle

Questions or Inquiries?

Just want to say Hello? Sign the .

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Click image to replace if unable to read.

Enter the digits from the image above, except for the last one:

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


By Bob Halstead

Buddies are not essential for a safe dive. On the contrary, buddies often increase the risk of a dive, either directly through unpredictable or unreliable actions, or indirectly, through an unfounded belief that security is enhanced by numbers alone, regardless of the training or state of mind of the buddy. In most instances, a competent solo diver would be much safer than the average buddy dive.

Most textbooks do not define the buddy system - an interesting point in itself. I define it as the situation that occurs when two divers of similar interests and equal experience and ability share a dive, continuously monitoring each other throughout entry, the dive, and the exit, and remaining within such distance that they could render immediate assistance to each other if required.

Obviously, this definition represents the ideal, and upon honest examination, it's clear that it has little to do with the reality as practiced by most divers. The truth is that on most dives, the buddy system fails.

Printed from njscuba.net