Just About Done ...

Weather Stations

... I hope. There may still be an old-style chart lurking somewhere, but I think I got them all. Above is the new weather chart, with extant stations and buoys. The old chart still showed ALSN6 - the Ambrose Tower that got knocked into the water so many times that they finally gave up on it. The replacement buoy is in the exclusion zone of the shipping lane, where it should be safe.

The new system makes it so easy to add or change sites and charts. I was worried that there might be some performance impact, but I really don't see any. A big advantage for the user is that many charts can now be zoomed-in and panned. This is very useful where things get too crowded.

There are currently 1050 items in the database, and 116 charts in the website. I can slice and dice the data in many different ways, and when I put together different features, I see new and interesting details. I see several other weather buoys are in exclusion zones (white stripes) between shipping lanes, but 44025 is still tempting fate. And 44402 is in the abyss, about 8500 feet. That buoy is holding up over two miles of chain! Or cable, or something. Engineering! New York even established a new artificial reef in an exclusion zone, which strikes me as building a playground in the median of a divided highway!

U-151's path from Isabel B Wiley to Carolina

I think the new charts look great too - clean and precise. A little drab, maybe, for legibility's sake, but the shipping lanes add some color. In fact, the new charts look remarkably like the old charts, because I was always pretty happy with the design of those, but not the amount of work it took to make even small changes.

Thinking way back now, those charts were an awful lot or work to create - finding a suitable chart, scanning and scaling and cleaning it up, setting up the math in a spreadsheet and then plotting each point by hand in a graphics editor, with the associated label. Then creating html "image maps" to go along with each graphic to make it clickable. What a pain! 30 years ago there was nothing else like it though, I was way ahead of the curve. Now the machine does it all for me, I have finally caught up with technology. Well, I did write several thousand lines of code, that calls on many thousands more that somebody else wrote.

What do you think? Leave a comment below. Is it better, or did I ruin everything?


Comments on Just About Done ...

Questions or Inquiries?

Just want to say Hello? Sign the .

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Click image to replace if unable to read.

Enter the digits from the image above, except for the last one:

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


H10224/86 -- OPR-C121-WH-86; WHILE INVESTIGATING ITEM 751, AN AREA WITH NUMEROUS SIDE-SCAN SONAR CONTACT WAS FOUND AND DEVELOPED USING SIDE-SCAN AND ECHO SOUNDER; DIVER INVESTIGATION DETERMINED LIMITS OF SITE, NATURE OF WRECKAGE, AND LOCATION OF THE LEAST DEPTH; SITE WAS ORIENTED NORTHEAST-SOUTHWEST; CONSISTS MOSTLY OF SHIPYARD DEBRIS IN THE FORM OF HEAT EXCHANGERS, BUCKLED DECK PLATING, TWISTED ANGLE IRON, WOODEN RIBS, AND PIPING OF VARIOUS LENGTHS AND SIZES; THE NORTHEAST END OF THE SITE CONSISTED OF A BARGE LYING IN A NORTHWEST-SOUTHEAST DIRECTION WITH THE BOW OF THE BARGE DEFINING THE SOUTHEAST WALL OF THE SITE; THE NORTHWEST END OF THE BARGE, THE STERN, WAS COVERED WITH METAL DEBRIS, HAWSER LINES, AND TRAWLER NETTING; DIVERS CONCLUDED THAT THIS SITE IS THE WRECK OF A BARGE THAT WAS FILLED WITH SHIPYARD SCRAP IRON AND DEBRIS; PNEUMATIC DEPTH GAUGE LEAST DEPTH OF 50 FT. (ENTERED MSD 4/91)

Printed from njscuba.net